红宝石 - 阵列#℃之间的差异;<和阵列#推 [英] Ruby - Difference between Array#<< and Array#push

查看:129
本文介绍了红宝石 - 阵列#℃之间的差异;<和阵列#推的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

从检查对Ruby 1.9.3,这两个阵列#&LT的文件;<和阵列#推被设计为执行附加的元件,以当前数组的末尾。然而,似乎有在两者之间的细微差别。

From examining the documentation for Ruby 1.9.3, both Array#<< and Array#push were designed to implement appending an element to the end of the current array. However, there seem to be subtle differences between the two.

我所遇到的一种是*运算可用于整个其它数组的内容追加到当前一个,但只与#push

The one I have encountered is that the * operator can be used to append the contents of an entire other array to the current one, but only with #push.

a = [1,2,3]
b = [4,5,6]

a.push *b
=> [1,2,3,4,5,6]

尝试使用#&LT;&LT;而不是给出各种错误,这取决于它的使用点运算符和/或括号使用。

Attempting to use #<< instead gives various errors, depending on whether it's used with the dot operator and/or parentheses.

为什么#&LT;&LT;不行#push做同样的方式吗?一个实际上并不为其他的别名?

Why does #<< not work the same way #push does? Is one not actually an alias for the other?

推荐答案

他们都非常相似,但并不完全相同。

They are very similar, but not identical.

&LT;&LT; 接受一个参数,并推动它到数组的结尾。

<< accepts a single argument, and pushes it onto the end of the array.

,在另一方面,接受一个或多个参数,将它们推到全部结束。

push, on the other hand, accepts one or more arguments, pushing them all onto the end.

事实上,&LT;&LT; 只接受一个对象就是为什么你看到的错误

The fact that << only accepts a single object is why you're seeing the error.

这篇关于红宝石 - 阵列#℃之间的差异;&LT;和阵列#推的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆