&(*similarObject) 和similarObject 之间的区别?他们不一样吗? [英] Difference between &(*similarObject) and similarObject? Are they not same?

查看:34
本文介绍了&(*similarObject) 和similarObject 之间的区别?他们不一样吗?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

谁能给我解释一下

dynamic_cast<SomeObject *>( &(*similarObject) );

做一个解引用指针的地址有什么意义?指针本身不就是它的地址吗?

What is the point of doing the address of a dereferenced pointer? Wouldn’t the pointer itself just be the address of it?

推荐答案

可能是 similarObject 的类型重载了 operator* 所以它返回了地址您正在传递给 dynamic_cast.

It may be that the type of similarObject has overloaded operator* and so it returns something whose address you're passing to dynamic_cast.

&(*x)x 可能不总是一样的.例如,考虑迭代器:

&(*x) and x may not be always the same thing. For example, think of iterator:

std::map<int, int>::iterator it = v.begin();

那么 it&(*it) 是两个不同的东西:

Then it and &(*it) are two different thing:

  • it的类型是std::map::iterator
  • &(*it) 的类型是 std::pair*
  • The type of it is std::map<int, int>::iterator
  • The type of &(*it) is std::pair<int,int>*

他们完全不同.您的代码片段也可能发生类似的事情.

They're not at all same. Similar thing may happen with your code-snippet as well.

这篇关于&amp;(*similarObject) 和similarObject 之间的区别?他们不一样吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆