如何实现编译时检查,一个downcast在一个CRTP是有效的? [英] How to implement a compile-time check that a downcast is valid in a CRTP?

查看:177
本文介绍了如何实现编译时检查,一个downcast在一个CRTP是有效的?的处理方法,对大家解决问题具有一定的参考价值,需要的朋友们下面随着小编来一起学习吧!

问题描述

我有一个普通的旧CRPT(请不要因为访问限制而分心 - 问题不在于他们):

I have a plain old CRPT (please don't get distracted by access restrictions - the question is not about them):

 template<class Derived>
 class Base {
     void MethodToOverride()
     {
        // generic stuff here
     }
     void ProblematicMethod()
     {
         static_cast<Derived*>(this)->MethodToOverride();
     } 
 };

如下:

 class ConcreteDerived : public Base<ConcreteDerived> {
     void MethodToOverride()
     {
        //custom stuff here, then maybe
        Base::MethodToOverride();
     }
 };

现在 static_cast 我需要一个向下转换(不是向上转换),所以我必须使用显式转换。在所有合理的情况下,转换将是有效的,因为当前对象确实是派生类。

Now that static_cast bothers me. I need a downcast (not an upcast), so I have to use an explicit cast. In all reasonable cases the cast will be valid since the current object is indeed of the derived class.

但是如果我改变层次结构而转换现在变得无效了怎么办?

But what if I somehow change the hierarchy and the cast now becomes invalid?

我可以在某种程度上执行编译时检查,在这种情况下显式的downcast是有效的吗?

May I somehow enforce a compile-time check that an explicit downcast is valid in this case?

推荐答案

在编译期,你只能检查静态类型,这是 static_cast 已经做了。

At compile-time you can only check the static types, and that's what static_cast already does.

给定一个 Base * ,它只是,并且只能在运行时知道其动态类型,也就是说,它是否实际指向 ConcreteDerived 或其他东西。所以如果你想检查这个,它必须在运行时完成(例如使用 dynamic_cast

Given a Base*, it is only, and can only be, known at run-time what its dynamic type is, that is, whether it actually points to a ConcreteDerived or something else. So if you want to check this, it has to be done at runtime (for example by using dynamic_cast)

这篇关于如何实现编译时检查,一个downcast在一个CRTP是有效的?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持IT屋!

查看全文
登录 关闭
扫码关注1秒登录
发送“验证码”获取 | 15天全站免登陆