ImageMagick和GraphicsMagick有什么区别？ [英] What is the difference between ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick?

问题描述

我发现自己正在评估这两个库。除了GraphicsMagick的比较说，我看到ImageMagick仍然有更新，似乎两者几乎相同。

I've found myself evaluating both of these libs. Apart from what the GraphicsMagick comparison says, I see that ImageMagick still got updates and it seems that the two are almost identical.

我只是想做基本的图像处理在C ++中（即图像加载，过滤器，显示）;在这些库中进行选择时，我应该注意哪些差异？

I'm just looking to do basic image manipulation in C++ (i.e. image load, filters, display); are there any differences I should be aware of when choosing between these libraries?

推荐答案

从我所看到的，GraphicsMagick更稳定，是比较快的。
我做了几个不科学的测试，发现gm的速度是im的两倍（调整大小）。

From what I have read GraphicsMagick is more stable and is faster. I did a couple of unscientific tests and found gm to be twice as fast as im (doing a resize).

这篇关于ImageMagick和GraphicsMagick有什么区别？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！