是时候下车了微软跑步机吗？ [英] Time To Get Off The Microsoft Treadmill?

问题描述

http ：//www.angrycoder.com/article.as...=2003& m = 7& d = 17

我实际上是在1992年被拖到微软技术跑步机上当他们在俄亥俄州佩里斯堡买下福克斯时，
。是的，我是那些突然从'80年代（dBase，Clipper，

FoxBase / FoxPro）猛然闯入客户端的那些男朋友之一服务器淘金热。从Unix和Novell的

下界世界中被绑架我踢了一下并尖叫起来，最后我们学会了喜欢我的绑架者。


。 ...................

然后雷蒙德的公告开始出现我的时间我已经开始了我的第一场演出在.NET中：忘掉你在COM中所知道的东西。和COM是

死了和其他此类声明。所有关于n层

设计方法的炒作也已经死了？我认为这种方法是不可知的; b $ b不可知;您可以轻松地将原则应用于Java，它仍然是有意义的
！显然不是......至少根据微软专家的说法

。


从那时起，我又有了一些.NET机会。尽管如此，微软我已经按照n层理论保留了一些东西。而现在，在第一版.NET发布之前，油漆已经枯竭，一个全新的.NET发布了，并发布了一些关于他们如何破解的噪音一个非常好的DB

产品（SQL Server）所以它可以做.NET ala Oracle / Java。现在好了。我必须在我的旅行中学习Oracle（至少PL / SQL并存储

程序），以及SQL Server存储过程。那么现在所有的事情都在我的Transact-SQL处于危险之中吗？为什么我要在C＃中写入

存储过程？


所有这些变化工具的东西都在我的脑海里。虽然我不想要COBOL的稳定性（在你的职业生涯开始时学习一个工具，但在退休当天仍在使用它） />
派对），我也不想用我的生命来追逐梦想。我不知道大多数编码人员是如何做到这一点的，但当我决定投资

技术时，我做了一笔严肃的投资：我花了我所有的额外费用时间

和金钱购买无穷无尽的50美元书籍，阅读5美元的杂志，

在线研究，是的，甚至上课。我已经为微软的愿景提供了一些非常好的年份，并且在

流程中过得很好。是时候改变了吗？

http://www.angrycoder.com/article.as...=2003&m=7&d=17
I was actually dragged onto the Microsoft technology treadmill in 1992
when they bought out Fox in Perrysburg, Ohio. Yep, I''m one of those
XBase guys who was suddenly jerked out of the ''80s (dBase, Clipper,
FoxBase/FoxPro) into the Client/Server gold rush. Kidnapped from the
nether worlds of Unix and Novell I kicked and screamed and finally
learned to like my captors.

....................
Then the announcements from Redmond started coming about the time I
got my first gig in .NET: "Forget what you knew in COM." and "COM is
dead" and other such statements. So all that hype about the n-tier
approach to design was also dead? I thought this approach was
agnostic; You could as easily apply the principles to Java and it
still made sense! Apparently not...at least according to the experts
at Microsoft.

Since that time, I''ve had a few more .NET opportunities. And in spite
of Microsoft I''ve kept things along the n-tier theory. And now, before
the paint has dried on the first release of .NET, a brand new .NET is
released and some noise about how they''re hacking up a really good DB
product (SQL Server) so it can do .NET ala Oracle/Java. Well now. I
had to learn Oracle along my travels (at least PL/SQL and stored
procedures), as well as SQL Server stored procedures. So now are all
my abilities in Transact-SQL in peril too? Why do I want to write
stored procedures in C# anyway?

All this change-the-tools stuff is getting under my skin. While I
don''t want the stability of COBOL (learn a tool at the beginning of
your career and still be using it on the day of your retirement
party), neither do I want to spend my life chasing the dream. I don''t
know how most coders do it, but when I decide to invest in a
technology, I make a serious investment: I spend all of my extra time
and money buying endless streams of $50 books, reading $5 magazines,
researching stuff online and yes, even taking classes. I''ve given some
very good years to Microsoft''s vision and made a decent living in the
process. Is it time for a change?

推荐答案

50本书，阅读

5本杂志，

在网上研究东西，是的，甚至上课。我已经为微软的愿景提供了一些非常好的年份，并且在

流程中过得很好。是时候改变了吗？

5 magazines,
researching stuff online and yes, even taking classes. I''ve given some
very good years to Microsoft''s vision and made a decent living in the
process. Is it time for a change?

luke潦草地说：


< deletia>

luke scribbled:

<deletia>

从Unix和Novell的幽灵世界中被绑架我踢了一下并尖叫起来，最后学会了喜欢我的绑架者。

Kidnapped from the
nether worlds of Unix and Novell I kicked and screamed and finally
learned to like my captors.

那会踢斯德哥尔摩综合症。


< deletia>


-

自由软件基金会（FSF） ）准会员499

Linux计数器LRU 277671

LindowsOS v3.0（Linux内核2.4.19）Compaq Presario 3555 Pentium III

That would be the Stockholm Syndrome kicking in.

<deletia>

--
Free Software Foundation (FSF) Associate Member 499
Linux Counter LRU 277671
LindowsOS v3.0 (Linux kernel 2.4.19) Compaq Presario 3555 Pentium III

这篇关于是时候下车了微软跑步机吗？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！