新闻组礼仪：回应 [英] Newsgroup Etiquette: Responses
问题描述
我发现最近对消息的回复非常短暂，例如，
谢谢，它工作，它没有用，我试试那个非常无益
我建议回复中包含足够的原始/之前的
帖子，以便人们对所讨论的内容有所了解。
-
-
Lyle
"那些试图控制思想的人的目标是总是一样。他们
找到一个世界的单一解释，一个思想系统和
行动将（他们相信）涵盖一切;然后他们试着将b $ b强加给所有有思想的人。
- Gilbert Highet
" Lyle Fairfield" < LY ****** @ yahoo.ca>在消息中写道
新闻：Xb *************** @ read1.cgocable.net ...我发现最近对消息的回复非常简短，例如，谢谢，它工作，它没有工作，我会试试等等。非常无益，并建议回复中包含足够的原始/上一篇文章，以便人们可以对正在讨论的内容有所了解。
闭嘴。 （见上面的帖子给你一些想法。）
GoJo4，
闭嘴！？这是一种相当诱人的反应。莱尔可能希望有一个更好的表现在这里寻求智慧的人们，但经验表明，这个b $ b $束有一个难以控制的难以控制的少数群体。我一个人，
感谢简洁，因为它让我转移到另一个线程，即
仍然有助于帮助某人。
-
Alan Webb
kn ******* @ SPAMhotmail。 com
它不是IT，它是IS
" GoJo4" < NA ** @ nada.com>在消息中写道
新闻：DO ******************** @ vnet-inc.com ...
莱尔费尔菲尔德 < LY ****** @ yahoo.ca>在消息中写道
新闻：Xb *************** @ read1.cgocable.net ...我发现最近的口水很短回复消息，例如，谢谢，它工作，它不起作用，我会尝试等消息。非常无益
我建议回复中包含足够的原始/以前的帖子，以便人们对正在讨论的内容有所了解。
闭嘴。 （见上面的帖子给你一些想法。）
谢谢。
:-)
I find the recent spat of very short replies to messages, such as,
"Thanks", "It worked", "It didn''t work", "I''ll try that" very unhelpful
and am suggesting that replies include enough of the original/previous
post that one may have some idea about what is being discussed.
--
--
Lyle
"The aim of those who try to control thought is always the same. They
find one single explanation of the world, one system of thought and
action that will (they believe) cover everything; and then they try to
impose that on all thinking people."
- Gilbert Highet
"Lyle Fairfield" <ly******@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:Xb***************@read1.cgocable.net...I find the recent spat of very short replies to messages, such as,
"Thanks", "It worked", "It didn''t work", "I''ll try that" very unhelpful and
am suggesting that replies include enough of the original/previous post
that one may have some idea about what is being discussed.
Shut up. (See above post to give you some idea.)
GoJo4,
"Shut Up!?" A rather trollish response, that. Lyle may wish for a better
behaved populus seeking wisdom here but experience demonstrates that this
bunch has an unruly minority that is difficult to contain. I for one,
appreciate the brevity because it lets me move on to another thread that is
still serving to help someone.
--
Alan Webb
kn*******@SPAMhotmail.com
"It''s not IT, it''s IS"
"GoJo4" <na**@nada.com> wrote in message
news:DO********************@vnet-inc.com...
"Lyle Fairfield" <ly******@yahoo.ca> wrote in message
news:Xb***************@read1.cgocable.net...I find the recent spat of very short replies to messages, such as,
"Thanks", "It worked", "It didn''t work", "I''ll try that" very unhelpful
and am suggesting that replies include enough of the original/previous
post that one may have some idea about what is being discussed.
Shut up. (See above post to give you some idea.)
Thanks.
:-)
这篇关于新闻组礼仪：回应的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
