新访问2007新闻组在哪里？ [英] where is the new access 2007 newsgroup?

问题描述

因为Access 2007是一个''重大改变''然后我假设MS将要为它创建一个新的新闻组。


我意思;当VB.net 2002问世;他们决定将''main vb

新闻组'重命名为''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''


现在..当人们去microsoft.public.vb他们看到'vb as a dead

语言''


所以我提名这个新闻组名称为Access 2007


Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Access


不是很好吗？

我的意思是;微软是假设一个较长的组名使得

对于新版本的Access来说更合适..


首先，微软必须是一致。


所以谁投票给

Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Access


if他们不想改变新闻组名称;然后我要求他们

将vb组''microsoft.public.dotnet.langauges.vb'重命名为

microsoft.public.vb


我的意思是认真的。他们需要保持一致


谢谢


-Aaron

since Access 2007 is a ''major change'' then i assume that MS is going to
make a new newsgroup for it.

I mean; when VB.net 2002 came out; they decided to rename the ''main vb
newsgroup'' as ''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''

and now.. when people go to microsoft.public.vb they see ''vb as a dead
language''

so I nominate this newsgroup name for Access 2007

Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Access

wouldn''t that be great?
I mean; the Microsoft was is to assume that a longer group name makes
it MORE APPROPRIATE for a new version of Access..

above all, Microsoft needs to be consistent.

so who votes for
Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Access

if they don''t want to change the newsgroup name; then I ask that they
rename the vb group ''microsoft.public.dotnet.langauges.vb'' to
microsoft.public.vb

I mean seriously here. They need to be consistent

Thanks

-Aaron

推荐答案

我同意。


我们应该为Access获取一个糟糕的长屁新闻组名称

2007或者我们应该删除这些讽刺对于microsoft.public.vb

新闻组


一致性，微软

我只是死得很累的打字

''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''


-Aaron

aa ********* @ gmail.com 写道：

I agree.

we should either make a fucked up long ass newsgroup name for Access
2007 or we should UNDO the travesty for the microsoft.public.vb
newsgroup

consistency, microsoft

IM JUST DEAD FUCKING TIRED OF TYPING
''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''

-Aaron

aa*********@gmail.com wrote:

因为Access 2007是一个''重大改变''然后我假设MS将会为它创建一个新的新闻组。


我的意思是;当VB.net 2002问世;他们决定将''main vb

新闻组'重命名为''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''


现在..当人们去microsoft.public.vb他们看到'vb as a dead

语言''


所以我提名这个新闻组名称为Access 2007


Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Access


不是很好吗？

我的意思是;微软是假设一个较长的组名使得

对于新版本的Access来说更合适..


首先，微软必须是一致。


所以谁投票给

Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Access


if他们不想改变新闻组名称;然后我要求他们

将vb组''microsoft.public.dotnet.langauges.vb'重命名为

microsoft.public.vb


我的意思是认真的。他们需要保持一致


谢谢


-Aaron

since Access 2007 is a ''major change'' then i assume that MS is going to
make a new newsgroup for it.

I mean; when VB.net 2002 came out; they decided to rename the ''main vb
newsgroup'' as ''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''

and now.. when people go to microsoft.public.vb they see ''vb as a dead
language''

so I nominate this newsgroup name for Access 2007

Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Access

wouldn''t that be great?
I mean; the Microsoft was is to assume that a longer group name makes
it MORE APPROPRIATE for a new version of Access..

above all, Microsoft needs to be consistent.

so who votes for
Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Access

if they don''t want to change the newsgroup name; then I ask that they
rename the vb group ''microsoft.public.dotnet.langauges.vb'' to
microsoft.public.vb

I mean seriously here. They need to be consistent

Thanks

-Aaron

好吧不要再这么说了..可能会节省你一段时间的口述。

对不起，我的意思是打字。


我不觉得我'EVER键入了这句话......：S


< db ******* @ hotmail.comwrote in message

news ：11 ********************** @ 80g2000cwy.googlegro ups.com ...

Well stop bitching about it.. might save you some time in dictating.
Sorry, I mean typing.

I don''t think I''ve EVER typed in that phrase.... :S

<db*******@hotmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@80g2000cwy.googlegro ups.com...

>我同意。


我们应该为Access获得一个糟糕的长屁新闻组名称

2007或者我们应该删除对microsoft.public的讽刺.vb

新闻组


一致性，微软

IM JAD DEAD FUCKING TIRED OF TYPING

''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''


-Aaron

aa ********* @ gmail.com 写道：

> s ince Access 2007是一个''重大变化''然后我假设MS将为它创建一个新的新闻组。

我的意思是;当VB.net 2002问世;他们决定将''main vb
newsgroup''重命名为''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''

现在......当人们去microsoft.public时。 vb他们看到''vb as a dead
语言''

所以我为Access 2007提名这个新闻组名称

Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications .Acces s

那不是很好吗？
我的意思是;微软是假设一个更长的群组名称使得它更适合新版本的Access ..

首先，微软需要保持一致。

然后我要求他们将vb组''microsoft.public.dotnet.langauges.vb''重命名为
microsoft.public.vb

我的意思是认真对待。他们需要保持一致

谢谢

-Aaron

>since Access 2007 is a ''major change'' then i assume that MS is going to
make a new newsgroup for it.

I mean; when VB.net 2002 came out; they decided to rename the ''main vb
newsgroup'' as ''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''

and now.. when people go to microsoft.public.vb they see ''vb as a dead
language''

so I nominate this newsgroup name for Access 2007

Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Acces s

wouldn''t that be great?
I mean; the Microsoft was is to assume that a longer group name makes
it MORE APPROPRIATE for a new version of Access..

above all, Microsoft needs to be consistent.

so who votes for
Microsoft.Public.Office.2007.Applications.Acces s

if they don''t want to change the newsgroup name; then I ask that they
rename the vb group ''microsoft.public.dotnet.langauges.vb'' to
microsoft.public.vb

I mean seriously here. They need to be consistent

Thanks

-Aaron

db*******@hotmail.com 写道：

IM JAD DEAD FUCKING TIRED OF TYPING

''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''

IM JUST DEAD FUCKING TIRED OF TYPING
''Microsoft.Public.Dotnet.Languages.VB''

你必须每天输入多少次？除了发布到

时，小组说这个名字有多长？


我不确定我输入过的名字是什么？任何MS的新闻组。我只是从我的新闻阅读器列表中选择它们。


名字有点长，被授予，但对我来说这似乎是一个合理的名称。

我不认为MS的新闻组命名方案也非常一致，但是

并不是真的有问题。只要你能找到你想要发布的小组（通常不是很难），那就是重要的事情。

为VB6提供单独的新闻组VB.NET是一件好事，否则

一半的流量将完全偏离主题，这取决于你的观点。


MS有更重要的事情公众要担心公开

新闻组命名方案IMO。


-


（O）enone

How many times a day do you have to type that? Apart from when posting to
the group saying how long the name is?

I''m not sure I''ve ever typed in the names of any of MS''s newsgroups. I just
pick them from a list in my newsreader.

The name is a bit long, granted, but it seems like a reasonable name to me.
I don''t think MS''s newsgroup naming scheme is very consistent either but
don''t really have a problem with it. As long as you can find the group you
want to post to (not usually very hard) then that''s the important thing.
Having separate newsgroups for VB6 and VB.NET is a good thing, otherwise
half the traffic would be completely off topic, depending on your viewpoint.

There are more important things for MS to do than worry about public
newsgroup naming schemes IMO.

--

(O)enone

这篇关于新访问2007新闻组在哪里？的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！