拆分新闻组。 [英] Split the newsgroup.
问题描述
看来，那些想要将小组获得更高水平的人和刚刚学习的人之间存在强烈的分歧。或许，现在是时候将b $ b拆分为新闻组了。我建议如下：
comp.lang.c（unmoderated）
comp.lang.c.experts（已审核）
Chuck Crayne有一个成功的主持新闻组comp.lang.asm.x86。这里的流量是
，没有理由为高级C用户提供一个适度的新闻组来支付高级C用户不会成功。
Rod Pemberton
2006年2月4日星期六04:42:14 GMT，Rod Pemberton
< ;做******* @ bitbucket.cmm>在comp.lang.c中写道：
似乎那些想要把团队带到更高层次的人和那些只是在学习。也许，现在是时候给b
$ b Gibberish，使用未定义的主观术语更高级别。
只在海报的脑海中有特定的含义。显然缺乏
基本逻辑。
拆分新闻组。我建议如下：
comp.lang.c（unmoderated）
comp.lang.c.experts（主持）
Chuck Crayne有一个成功的主持新闻组comp.lang.asm.x86。有了这里的流量，没有理由为高级C用户提供适度的新闻组不会成功。
已经有alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c ++对
初学者很有用，并且有一些comp.lang.c.moderated，其中Seebs做了他的
最好是压低噪音水平。
一个小组主持只允许专家的帖子。很可能会被主持人滥用给b $ b。对于话题性的调节比对专家性的调节要容易得多，这可能都是主观上的所有。
- -
Jack Klein
主页： http：/ /JK-Technology.Com
常见问题解答
comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/
comp.lang.c ++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt。 comp.lang.learn.c-c ++
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~a...FAQ-acllc.html
" Rod Pemberton" <做******* @ bitbucket.cmm>在留言中写道
新闻：0u ************* @ news.infowest.com ...
好像那些想要将
组升级到更高级别的人与刚刚学习的人之间存在着强烈的分歧。或许，是时候分裂新闻组了。我建议如下：
comp.lang.c（unmoderated）
comp.lang.c.experts（主持）
Chuck Crayne有一个成功的主持新闻组comp.lang.asm.x86。随着这里的流量很大，没有理由为高级C用户提供适度的新闻组
不会成功。
我们已经有一个名为
comp.lang.c.moderated的成功主持新闻组。我认为没有理由成为精英主义者，而且专家组只有一个小组。毕竟，如果每个人都是小组的专家，那么
就不会讨论太多了。
-
MrG {DRGN}
通过迷雾前进!!
Rod Pemberton写道：它似乎那些希望将这个团队带到更高层次的人和那些刚刚学习的人之间存在着强烈的分歧。或许，是时候分裂新闻组了。
???
请定义您认为的更高级别。
如果您只想要一个地方讨论范围之外的事情
of comp.lang.c，然后这样说。
除此之外，你要命名两个团队，这可能是，取决于
定义为提升到更高级别，不包括
所有甚至是参与者的主要部分。
对于学习者，已经___新闻组，
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c ++
我建议如下：
comp.lang.c（unmoderated）
comp.lang.c.experts（主持）
Chuck Crayne有一个成功的主持新闻组comp.lang.asm.x86。有了这里的流量，没有理由为高级C用户提供适度的新闻组不会成功。
再一次，我不确定你的目标是什么。
为什么你觉得专家不应该受到低学习者的困扰？或者专家需要有人在将它们放在盘子上之前咀嚼它们的肉类吗？
请清楚简洁地定义潜在的参与者
$每组b $ b。解释为什么你想让一组
被调节的组。定义每个
新闻组的范围。
BTW：将此帖子连接到其他帖子中的回复
使它成为现实似乎更有可能你想要一个新闻组
讨论典型的扩展以及它们如何工作，并且可以在不同的实现中使用
。
干杯
Michael
-
电子邮箱：我的是/ at / gmx / dot / de地址。
It seems there is a strong division between those who want to take the group
to a higher level and those who are just learning. Perhaps, it''s time to
split the newsgroup. I''d suggest the following:
comp.lang.c (unmoderated)
comp.lang.c.experts (moderated)
Chuck Crayne has a successful moderated newsgroup comp.lang.asm.x86. With
the volume of traffic here, there is no reason why a moderated newsgroup for
advanced C users wouldn''t be successful.
Rod Pemberton
On Sat, 04 Feb 2006 04:42:14 GMT, "Rod Pemberton"
<do*******@bitbucket.cmm> wrote in comp.lang.c:
It seems there is a strong division between those who want to take the group
to a higher level and those who are just learning. Perhaps, it''s time to
Gibberish, use of an undefined subjective term "higher level" which
has a specific meaning only in the poster''s mind. Obviously lacking
elementary logic.
split the newsgroup. I''d suggest the following:
comp.lang.c (unmoderated)
comp.lang.c.experts (moderated)
Chuck Crayne has a successful moderated newsgroup comp.lang.asm.x86. With
the volume of traffic here, there is no reason why a moderated newsgroup for
advanced C users wouldn''t be successful.
There is already alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++ which is useful to
beginners, and there is comp.lang.c.moderated where Seebs does his
best to hold down the noise level.
A group moderated to only allow posts by "experts" is far too likely
to be abused by a moderator. Moderating for topicality is
considerably easier than moderating for "expertness", which can be all
too subjective.
--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++
http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~a...FAQ-acllc.html
"Rod Pemberton" <do*******@bitbucket.cmm> wrote in message
news:0u*************@news.infowest.com...
It seems there is a strong division between those who want to take the
group
to a higher level and those who are just learning. Perhaps, it''s time to
split the newsgroup. I''d suggest the following:
comp.lang.c (unmoderated)
comp.lang.c.experts (moderated)
Chuck Crayne has a successful moderated newsgroup comp.lang.asm.x86. With
the volume of traffic here, there is no reason why a moderated newsgroup
for
advanced C users wouldn''t be successful.
We already have a successful moderated newsgroup called
comp.lang.c.moderated. I see no reason to be elitist, and have a group just
for experts. After all, if everyone were an expert in the group then there
would not be much to discuss.
--
MrG{DRGN}
Onward through the fog!!
Rod Pemberton wrote:It seems there is a strong division between those who want to take the group
to a higher level and those who are just learning. Perhaps, it''s time to
split the newsgroup.
???
Please define what you consider a "higher level".
If you just want a place to discuss things outside the scope
of comp.lang.c, then say so.
Apart from that, you are naming two groups which may, depending
on your definition of "taking to a higher level", not cover
all or even a major part of the participants.
For learners, there already _is_ a newsgroup,
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++
I''d suggest the following:
comp.lang.c (unmoderated)
comp.lang.c.experts (moderated)
Chuck Crayne has a successful moderated newsgroup comp.lang.asm.x86. With
the volume of traffic here, there is no reason why a moderated newsgroup for
advanced C users wouldn''t be successful.
Once again, I am not sure what you are aiming at.
Why do you feel that experts should not be bothered by the
lowly learners? Or that experts need someone to chew their
meat before they get it on their plate?
Please define clearly and concisely the potential participants
of each group. Explain the reason why you want to have one of
the groups moderated. Define the scope of each of the
newsgroups.
BTW: Connecting this post to your replies in other threads
makes it seem more likely that you are wishing for a newsgroup
discussing typical extensions and how they work and can be
used in different implementations.
Cheers
Michael
--
E-Mail: Mine is an /at/ gmx /dot/ de address.
这篇关于拆分新闻组。的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
