新闻组礼仪...... [英] Newsgroup etiquette...
问题描述
我一再对那些浪费的人感到沮丧。其他人的帖子
提问。通过浪费我的意思是公开回复帖子没有
提供有用的答案。我必须承认，我的一些问题还没有足够具体，所以我得到了无益的答案。我的错。但我经常会收到我也遇到过这个问题的回复。这个问题没有实际的
anser。这使得这个问题看起来好像已被回答
当它没有，而像我这样的人喜欢回答未回答的问题
跳过这些帖子。像其他一些人一样，我经常寻找
未解答的问题来帮助别人，因为我得到了帮助。我通常不会花费我的时间来回答已经回答过的帖子。人们
应该只给出具体的回答。我实际上已经看过回复了
你试过帮助了吗？。没用。
尽管我已经对那些无用的回答的人抱怨了，但我确实说b / b
说有用问题的责任在于海报。我已经提出了
为提问和回答问题的人提供了一些有用的提示：
对于提问者：
如果你是初学者，请这样说。这将有助于你得到答案，你可以实现
。
提出具体的问题。
举例说明你已经做过的事情人们不会回答你已经做过的事情。
提供你的电子邮件地址，以便其他人可以私下要求澄清。
对于回答者：
如果您需要澄清，请发送私人电子邮件给海报，以便公众
问题看起来不像''已被回答。
只提供具体的回答。
请随时回复此帖子，公开或私下，
正面或负面评论。我欢迎构建批评。
谢谢。
Matthew Wells
MW **** @ FirstByte.net
" Matthew Wells" < MW **** @ FirstByte.net>在消息中写道
news：ul **************** @ newsread1.news.atl.earthli nk.net ... 提问。通过浪费我的意思是公开回复帖子而不提供有用的答案。我必须承认，我的一些问题还不够具体，所以我得到了无益的答案。我的错。但是，我经常会收到类似我也遇到过这个问题的回复。没有
实际
anser的问题。这使得这个问题看起来好像已经回答
当它没有时，像我这样的人喜欢回答未回答的问题
跳过这些帖子。像这里的其他人一样，我经常寻找未解决的问题来帮助别人，因为我得到了帮助。我通常不会浪费时间回答已经回答过的帖子。
当然，回答的帖子并不总能正确回答...
人们
应该只给出具体的回答。我确实看到了回复
你试过帮助吗？。无用。
实际上，我并不认为这总是无用的。回答。很多人似乎觉得可以在这里提出问题（以及其他新闻组），而不需要付出任何努力来解决问题。他们首先拥有他们的b $ b。
尽管我已经对那些无用的回答的人抱怨了，但我还是要说一个有用的问题的责任在海报上。我已经提出了一些有用的提示给那些提问和回答问题的人：
对于提问者：
如果你是初学者，请说。这将帮助您获得可以实施的答案。
让您的问题具体化。
举例说明您已经做过的事情让人们不回答
你已经完成了。
提供你的电子邮件地址，以便其他人可以私下要求澄清。
对于回答者：
如果你需要澄清，请发送一个私人电子邮件发送到海报，所以
公共
问题看起来没有得到回答。
只给出具体的回答。
很抱歉，但我不同意您使用私人电子邮件的建议
澄清。新闻组的观点是每个人都受益。如果你这个讨论脱机，那么它就不会被谷歌存档，所以
其他有同样问题的人也找不到它。 br $>
我的价值2美分。
-
Doug Steele，Microsoft Access MVP
< a rel =nofollowhref =http://I.Am/DougSteeletarget =_ blank> http://I.Am/DougSteele
（没有e-请发邮件！）
" Matthew Wells" < MW **** @ FirstByte.net>在消息中写道
news：ul **************** @ newsread1.news.atl.earthli nk.net ... 帖子。通过浪费我的意思是公开回复帖子而不提供有用的答案。我必须承认，我的一些问题还不够具体，所以我得到了无益的答案。我的错。但是，我经常会收到类似我也遇到过这个问题的回复。没有
实际的问题。这使得这个问题看起来好像已经被
回答了，当它没有时，像我这样的人喜欢回答未回答的问题
跳过那些帖子。像这里的其他人一样，我经常寻找未解决的问题来帮助别人，因为我得到了帮助。我通常不会浪费时间回答已经回答过的帖子。人们只应该给出具体的回答。我确实看到过
的回复你试过帮助吗？。没用。
尽管我已经对那些无用的回答的人抱怨，但我确实说，有用的问题的责任在海报上。我提出了一些有用的提示，要求和回答问题：
对于提问者：
如果你是初学者，请说出来。这将帮助您获得可以实施的答案。
让您的问题具体化。
举例说明您已经完成的工作，以便人们不会回复
什么您已经完成了。
提供您的电子邮件地址，以便其他人可以私下要求澄清。
对于回答者：
如果您需要澄清，请发送私人电子邮件给海报所以
的公开问题看起来并没有得到回答。
只给出具体的回答。
请随时回复此帖，公开或私下里，有正面或负面的评论。我欢迎构建批评。
谢谢。
你试过帮助吗？
< blockquote> On Sun，2005年4月10日16:18:34 GMT，Matthew Wells
< MW **** @ FirstByte.net>写道：
我认为要求在ng中澄清是好的。我很惊讶
关于OP的反应频率是多少。
鉴于大多数帖子得到的答案不止一个，我不知道t
认为你的前提是一个看似回答的问题没有得到
进一步答案是对的。
-Tom。
< clip>
对于回答者：
如果您需要澄清，请发送一封私人电子邮件给海报，这样公众的问题就不会得到回答了。
只给出具体的回答。
请随时以公开或私下方式回复此帖，并附上
正面或负面评论。我欢迎构建批评。
谢谢。
Matthew Wells
MW****@FirstByte.net
I have repeatedly been frustrated by people who "waste" other people''s posts
that ask questions. By "waste" I mean publicy replying to a post without
offering a useful answer. I must admit that some of my questions have not
been specific enough so I get unhelpful answers. My bad. But I often get
replies that read something like "I''ve had this problem too" with no actual
anser to the question. This makes the question look like it''s been answered
when it hasn''t, and people like me who like to answer unanswered questions
skip right over those posts. Like some others here, I often look for
unanswered questions to help others as I''ve been helped. I usually don''t
waste my time answering posts that have already been answered. People
should only give specific answeres. I''ve actually seen responses that read
"Have you tried the Help?". Useless.
As much as I''ve kvetched about the people who give useless answeres, I do
say that the onus for a useful question is on the poster. I''ve come up with
some helpful hints for people who ask and answer questions:
For the asker:
If you are a beginner, say so. This will help you get answeres you can
implement.
Make your questions specific.
Give examples of what you''ve already done so people don''t respond with what
you''ve already done.
Provide your email address so others can privately ask for clarification.
For the answerer:
If you need clarification, send a private email to the poster so the public
question doesn''t look like it''s been answered.
Only give specific answeres.
Please feel free to respond to this post, publicly or privately, with
positive or negative remarks. I welcome constructuve criticism.
Thank you.
Matthew Wells
MW****@FirstByte.net
"Matthew Wells" <MW****@FirstByte.net> wrote in message
news:ul****************@newsread1.news.atl.earthli nk.net...I have repeatedly been frustrated by people who "waste" other people''s
posts
that ask questions. By "waste" I mean publicy replying to a post without
offering a useful answer. I must admit that some of my questions have not
been specific enough so I get unhelpful answers. My bad. But I often get
replies that read something like "I''ve had this problem too" with no
actual
anser to the question. This makes the question look like it''s been
answered
when it hasn''t, and people like me who like to answer unanswered questions
skip right over those posts. Like some others here, I often look for
unanswered questions to help others as I''ve been helped. I usually don''t
waste my time answering posts that have already been answered.
Of course, answered posts aren''t always answered correctly...
People
should only give specific answeres. I''ve actually seen responses that
read
"Have you tried the Help?". Useless.
Actually, I don''t think that''s always a "useless" answer. It would appear
that a number of people seem to feel it''s okay to ask questions here (and
other newsgroups) without making any effort to solve the problem on their
own first.
As much as I''ve kvetched about the people who give useless answeres, I do
say that the onus for a useful question is on the poster. I''ve come up
with
some helpful hints for people who ask and answer questions:
For the asker:
If you are a beginner, say so. This will help you get answeres you can
implement.
Make your questions specific.
Give examples of what you''ve already done so people don''t respond with
what
you''ve already done.
Provide your email address so others can privately ask for clarification.
For the answerer:
If you need clarification, send a private email to the poster so the
public
question doesn''t look like it''s been answered.
Only give specific answeres.
Sorry, but I don''t agree with your suggestions of using private e-mail for
clarification. The point of newsgroups is that everyone benefits. If you
take the discussion off-line, then it doesn''t get archived in Google, so
others with the same problem won''t find it.
Just my 2 cents worth.
--
Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP
http://I.Am/DougSteele
(no e-mails, please!)
"Matthew Wells" <MW****@FirstByte.net> wrote in message
news:ul****************@newsread1.news.atl.earthli nk.net...I have repeatedly been frustrated by people who "waste" other people''s posts that ask questions. By "waste" I mean publicy replying to a post without
offering a useful answer. I must admit that some of my questions have not
been specific enough so I get unhelpful answers. My bad. But I often get
replies that read something like "I''ve had this problem too" with no actual anser to the question. This makes the question look like it''s been answered when it hasn''t, and people like me who like to answer unanswered questions
skip right over those posts. Like some others here, I often look for
unanswered questions to help others as I''ve been helped. I usually don''t
waste my time answering posts that have already been answered. People
should only give specific answeres. I''ve actually seen responses that read "Have you tried the Help?". Useless.
As much as I''ve kvetched about the people who give useless answeres, I do
say that the onus for a useful question is on the poster. I''ve come up with some helpful hints for people who ask and answer questions:
For the asker:
If you are a beginner, say so. This will help you get answeres you can
implement.
Make your questions specific.
Give examples of what you''ve already done so people don''t respond with what you''ve already done.
Provide your email address so others can privately ask for clarification.
For the answerer:
If you need clarification, send a private email to the poster so the public question doesn''t look like it''s been answered.
Only give specific answeres.
Please feel free to respond to this post, publicly or privately, with
positive or negative remarks. I welcome constructuve criticism.
Thank you.
Have you tried Help?
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:18:34 GMT, "Matthew Wells"
<MW****@FirstByte.net> wrote:
I think asking for clarification in the ng is fine. What I''m surprised
about is how often the OP doesn''t respond.
Given the fact that most postings get more than one answer, I don''t
think your premise of "a question that appears answered doesn''t get
further answers" is correct.
-Tom.
<clip>
For the answerer:
If you need clarification, send a private email to the poster so the public
question doesn''t look like it''s been answered.
Only give specific answeres.
Please feel free to respond to this post, publicly or privately, with
positive or negative remarks. I welcome constructuve criticism.
Thank you.
Matthew Wells
MW****@FirstByte.net
这篇关于新闻组礼仪......的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！
