完成与新闻组狂妄自大的对话（主题变更......） [英] Finalizing the dialogue with newsgroup Megalomaniacs (change of Subject...)

问题描述

如果我们所有人都能建议我们认为合理的新闻组常见问题解答中包含这些内容的变化，那就太棒了。

希望我们能够提出一个我们所有人的版本，包括

沉默的大多数，感觉能够改善这个新闻组的集体体验

。


感谢您的参与。


给小组现有成员：请理解每一个

专家在一个领域，有许多新人需要指导

并帮助开始。请鼓励所有问题的新人，即使没有经过充分研究或精心设计的问题，也要鼓励新人。对于某个领域缺乏必要

协调的人来说，这些

的品质是不可能的，如果没有我们的初步帮助，我们将只会延迟
这些新人在获得必要技能方面取得了进步，成为这一群体的富有成效的成员。如果你不想回复帖子因为它没有得到很好的研究，或者很好地构建了b $ b，请忽略帖子。

It would be great if we could all suggest variations of this caluse
that we feel is reasonable to be included in the newsgroup FAQ.
Hopefully we can come up with a version that we all, including the
silent majority, feel leads to improving out collective experiences in
this newsgroup.

Thanks for your participation.

"to existing members of the group: please understand that for every
expert in a field, there are many new comers who will need direction
and help to get started. Please encourage new-comers by being tolerant
of all questions, even if not well-researched, or well-phrased. These
qualities cannot be expected of someone lacking the necessary
coordination in a given field, and without our intial help, we will
only delay these new-comers'' progress in getting the necessary skills
to become productive memebers of this group. If you don''t feel like
answering a post because it is not well researched, or well
constructed, please ignore the post."

推荐答案

我认为你的陈述对于常见问题解答是一个不必要的补充。您表达的观点正是新闻组中最有帮助的
海报。如果你想看到他们不在的新闻组，

尝试任何USENET C或C变种新闻组。


我很少看到这里有用的参与者在要求

澄清以便他们可以提供帮助时，不要礼貌。当他们被要求澄清时，我常常看到那些寻求帮助的人得到了极大的反对 - 显然认为

某些地方出了问题，为我修好了，d **你在吗？应该够了

细节;如果一些通常有帮助的参与者对这样的

响应采取例外，我可以理解为什么。这不是一个关于研究不好的帖子，或者是不是很好的构建，这只是一个帖子的问题，只是

don''包含足够的信息来指明问题的原因

足够详细，以便我们可以提供帮助。


我也认为将海报引用到常见问题解答中没有错鼓励

研究，或者当一个主题已经多次讨论并且答案没有改变时，将它们引导到谷歌。我在这类

案例中的假设是，发布问题的人不知道建议的信息来源或他们可能使用Google搜索特定关键字

并且之前的讨论已经找到了。


除了那些投资很多的人是非常居高临下的事实

的时间和精力来保持新闻组去了，已经做了所有的事情

被问到，这个帖子没什么不对。除了

徒劳的希望，每个在这里回答问题的人都会读到它，然后把它带到心里，并受其约束。在任何足够多的人群中，

会有一些人不容易相处。


Larry Linson

< sa **** @ gmail.com>在消息中写道

news：11 ********************** @ g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com ...

I am of the opinion that your statement would be an unnecessary addition to
the FAQ. The sentiments you express are exactly those of the most helpful
posters in the newsgroup. If you want to see a newsgroup where they are not,
try any of the USENET C or C-variations newsgroups.

I rarely see helpful participants here be anything but polite in requesting
clarification so they can help. I often see those asking for help get very
antagonistic when they are asked to clarify -- apparently thinking that
"something went wrong somewhere, fix it for me, d**n you" ought to be enough
detail; if a few normally-helpful participants take exception to such a
response, I can understand why. It is not a matter of posts that aren''t well
researched, or aren''t well constructed, it is a matter of posts that just
don''t contain enough information to specify what the problem is in
sufficient detail so we can help.

I also see nothing wrong with referring posters to the FAQ which encourages
research, or directing them to Google when a subject has already been
discussed many times and the answers haven''t changed. My assumption in such
cases is that the person posting the question is not aware of the sources of
information suggested or that they could have Googled on particular keywords
and found previous discussions.

Except for the fact that it is quite condescending to those who invest lots
of time and effort in keeping the newsgroup going, and already do everything
that is asked, there''s nothing wrong with the post. Except perhaps the
futile hope that every person who answers a question here will read it, take
it to heart, and be bound by it. In any sufficiently large group of people,
there will be some who are not easy to get along with.

Larry Linson
<sa****@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g14g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

如果我们都能建议我们认为合适的内容可以包含在新闻组常见问题中，那将是非常好的。
希望我们能来我们所有人的版本，包括沉默的大多数人，都感觉能够改善这个新闻组的集体体验。

感谢您的参与。
<对于该群体的现有成员：请理解，对于某个领域的每一位专家来说，有许多新人需要指导
并帮助他们入门。请鼓励新来者容忍所有问题，即使没有经过充分研究或精心设计。在特定领域缺乏必要的协调的人不能期望这些品质，如果没有我们的初步帮助，我们将只会推迟这些新人在获得必要技能方面的进步
成为这个群体的富有成效的成员。如果你不想回复帖子，因为它没有得到很好的研究，或者很好地构建，请忽略帖子。

It would be great if we could all suggest variations of this caluse
that we feel is reasonable to be included in the newsgroup FAQ.
Hopefully we can come up with a version that we all, including the
silent majority, feel leads to improving out collective experiences in
this newsgroup.

Thanks for your participation.

"to existing members of the group: please understand that for every
expert in a field, there are many new comers who will need direction
and help to get started. Please encourage new-comers by being tolerant
of all questions, even if not well-researched, or well-phrased. These
qualities cannot be expected of someone lacking the necessary
coordination in a given field, and without our intial help, we will
only delay these new-comers'' progress in getting the necessary skills
to become productive memebers of this group. If you don''t feel like
answering a post because it is not well researched, or well
constructed, please ignore the post."

< br>

2005年12月8日15:19:11 -0800" sa **** @ gmail.com" < SA **** @ gmail.com>写道：

On 8 Dec 2005 15:19:11 -0800 "sa****@gmail.com" <sa****@gmail.com> wrote:

如果我们都能建议我们认为合适的内容可以包含在新闻组常见问题中，那将是很好的。
希望我们可以提出一个我们所有人的版本，包括沉默的大多数，感觉能够改善这个新闻组的集体体验。

感谢您的参与。
对集团的现有成员：请理解，对于某个领域的每一位专家，都有很多新人

It would be great if we could all suggest variations of this caluse
that we feel is reasonable to be included in the newsgroup FAQ.
Hopefully we can come up with a version that we all, including the
silent majority, feel leads to improving out collective experiences in
this newsgroup.

Thanks for your participation.

"to existing members of the group: please understand that for every
expert in a field, there are many new comers

你没有FAQ的概念。这不是说NG中的

贡献者的道德标准 - 这是一个由一些常见问题组成的文件。和他们各自的答案。


它的设计就是这样，因为同样的问题一直在一遍又一遍地问起来。

。 br />

-

删除MYSHOES发送电子邮件

You have no concept of what a FAQ is for. It''s not to moralize the
contributors in a NG - it''s a document which consists of a number
of "Frequently Asked Questions" and their respective answers.

It''s designed that way because the same ol'' questions keep getting
asked over and over and over again.

--
remove MYSHOES to email

亲爱的先生MST ......


我觉得你沉迷于Jeopardy !!!!


我会把我的评论写成一个问题如果这是大多数人希望看到它的
！让我知道！

Dear Mr. MST...

I think you are addicted to Jeopardy!!!!

I''ll phrase my comment as a question if that is how the majority wish
to see it!!! Let me know!

这篇关于完成与新闻组狂妄自大的对话（主题变更......）的文章就介绍到这了，希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助，也希望大家多多支持IT屋！